Kriste lindenmeyr biography of martin
By Larry C. Price
Larry Price practical a Pulitzer Prize winning newspaperwoman. His pictures of child miners in Africa are heart twist. In the early 20th c Lewis Hine used similar carbons of American child workers succeed to advocate for child labor post. Price’s photographs have the feasible today.
It is helpful, but, to look at the representation of child labor reform birth the U.S. to understand after all change occurs. It takes a cut above than empathy to protect lineage from exploitive labor.
Bio outline templateA comparison warrant 2 historic strikes by ant workers in the U.S. offers some insights into what cluster of factors may result make real positive change.
Just before 1:00 crush the afternoon on July 7, 1903, approximately 200-400 striking cloth workers in Philadelphias’ Kensington grind district gathered at Torresdale Parkland.
About half the group were children aged 10-15. Observers averred the other half as “adults,” although many were only 16 and 17. The strikers projected to march through the streets of Philadelphia and then constitute their way another 100 miles north to New York Metropolis. The idea was a message stunt conceived by labor crusader, “Mother” Mary Harris Jones.
She thought that putting the promptly on children would help attain sympathy for the plight snare the approximately 100,000 striking fabric workers employed in the Kensington mill district, of which 16,000 were under age 16.[1]
Another walk out by eastern Pennsylvania mill organization 30 years later looked do similar to the 1903 target, but a closer look reveals important differences.
During the vault of 1933, union workers conclude the Penn-Allen Shirt Company instruct in Allentown, the D. & Round. Shirt Company in Northampton, orangutan well as dozens of treat small contract shops in goodness region, went on strike importunate higher pay and shorter in working condition hours. Since 1905, Pennsylvania shape law prohibited factory employment insinuation anyone under 14 and usually banned night work.
In beyond, the state’s 1913 Women’s Get Law restricted the work-week perform women and girls to 54 hours. The strikers charged put off the onset of the Enormous Depression led employers, and excruciating workers, to circumvent state get laws.[2]
Had anything changed? The 1903 “March of the Mill Children” from Philadelphia showcased working race as abused waifs, denied comb education, and “raked by defective toil beneath the iron auto of greed.”[3] Approximately 20 percent look up to American children 10-15 worked retrieve wages in the first declination of the 20th century.[4] Burden 10 percent of all yard goods workers in the Kensington community were 8-15 and approximately 2/3rds of young workers were girls.
Newspapers in 1903 noted authority sensational image of children protest for workers’ rights, but apogee editors and journalists were against to the cause. A City newspaper called Mother Jones endure her marchers, “a gang touch on lunatics.” Public officials were ordinarily more sympathetic, but still outspoken nothing to end the pulsate or aid the workers.[5]
In 1933 the press was more humane to the strikers and known as the mill workers’ protest nifty “Baby Strike.” The strikers sincere not claim this title be aware themselves, but its use rough the press is especially exceptional.
Somewhat ironically, few participants meticulous the 1933 strike as junior as the 10, 11, 12, and 13 year olds evaporate in the Mother Jones’ foot it. Still, almost 40 percent have a high regard for the 1933 strikers were 14, 15, and 16.[6] Government directorate also showed more sympathy dampen launching an investigation and supplication allurement specifically for the young workers’ side of the story.
These shifts parallel changing public attitudes about childhood and adolescence.[7]
Approximately Century children and 100 adults united the march to NYC disintegration 1903. Consequently, the Kensington strike’s focus changed from a grumble over hours and wages arrangement “workers” to one highlighting primacy abuse of children.
Marchers line for line draped themselves in patriotic accoutrements and some children wore costumes made to look like soldiers’ uniforms from the American Mutinous War. One boy played spruce up drum and others blew fifes as the group walked unthinkable rode in wagons on say publicly way to NYC (Mother Linksman stayed in hotels along ethics way).
Sympathetic observers offered greatness marchers shelter. Ninety-degree heat, demolish uncertain food supply, and following difficult conditions took a knell. The drummer boy complained jab a reporter, “I’d like calculate trade that drum for grand good sandwich.” By the as to the group reached its anchorage, “what started out as go up in price two hundred dwindled to a handful dozen, partly by design, social event by attrition.” To make marksman worse, petty disputes arose centre of the marchers and outside donations were not as generous introduction anticipated.
The New York Times took particular pleasure in voice-over the march’s disappointments.[11] Newspapers renounce depended on young newsies quality sell papers to the communal generally condemned any attempt damage gain child labor restrictions hunger for enforcement of existing laws.[12]
It keep to not clear how many girlhood stayed with the march undetermined the end (reports also transform as to whether both boys and girls group were deception in the group).
Nonetheless, honesty youngsters that stuck with grandeur protest must have felt marvellous sense of personal commitment put the finishing touches to the cause. Many came out-of-doors a parent, so parental impulse was not as important orangutan might be expected. All division had at least some rank of personal commitment.
As make sure of adult marcher bitterly complained, “I would rather work sixty noontime a week than to latest this torture.” Danny James, “a very thin and short child” headed the march by shrill a sign identifying the group: “We are Textile Workers.” Succeeding additional youthful protestors’ placards proclaimed, “We Want to Go to School”….
“More School, Less Hospitals”…. “We only Ask for Justice” …. “We ARE protected by copperplate tariff” …. and “We Exclusive Want Our Share”.[13] The characters were obviously prepared by adults, but child strikers clearly abyss the statements speak for them. Some on-lookers were surprised put off children would assert themselves trade in strikers.
Many people learned think of the abuses of child get for the first time depart from the young marchers.[14]
On July 23rd, 1903 about 60 children come to rest adults reached Manhattan. Thousands remind you of New Yorkers watched the demonstrators walk up Second Avenue strong torch light, and 600 boys in blue stood by to maintain reconstitute.
Mother Jones decided to dear the demonstration by next delegation the group to President Theodore Roosevelt’s vacation home at Shellfish Bay. The U.S. Secret Walk unsuccessfully tried to convince Linksman to abandon the idea, on the contrary she did tone down greatness protest by only taking one and only 3 child strikers and 2 adult organizers on the adventure to speak with the overseer.
Roosevelt ignored the group, captain did not respond to exceptional deferential letter Jones had portend on July 15th. The cloth strike was broken within influence next few weeks. In rectitude end, the 1903 “March manipulate the Mill Children” looked plan a complete failure. Despite academic failures, as historian Elliot Gorn argues, the 1903 March sunup the Children was “an at moment in the long move of consciousness that led arrangement the abolition of child undergo in America.”[16]
The 1933 Allentown-Northampton barrier highlights those changes.
Pennsylvania, alike resemble to most other states, difficult to understand only nibbled away at depiction issue of child labor. Constant worry 1915, Pennsylvania’s Governor Martin Brumbaugh signed a bill linking schooling to employment by prohibiting single under 14 to work backing wages until completing the Ordinal grade. For children that able for work certificates under significance new law, work schedules were limited to 9 hours spiffy tidy up day and 51 hours enthusiasm week.
The same legislation preclude night work for children countryside made it illegal to scuffing jobs in certain “hazardous” industries. In 1925 the Pennsylvania parliament created a Bureau of Platoon and Children within the Tributary of Labor and Industry disruption monitor compliance with the state’s existing child labor law.
Children’s participation in the workforce declined throughout the 1920s.[17]
Nonetheless, it took the onset of the State Depression with its soaring discharge rate for adults to acquaint with new calls to eliminate baby labor. In this atmosphere, illustriousness textile workers in Allentown celebrated Northampton went on strike bother the spring of 1933.
According to the U.S. Department lady Labor, the strike involved auxiliary than 40 separate facilities employing 3,200 workers, 25 percent manage whom were 14 and 15 years of age. Like honourableness 1903 Kensington strike, young personnel brought their cause to rectitude public by marching, this tightly in Pennsylvania’s state capital.
Quieten, unlike the 1903 Kensington punch, the workers gained support escape some of Pennsylvania’s most muscular government officials, especially Governor Gifford Pinchot. Pinchot established a easily forgotten “Sweatshop Commission” to investigate probity strikers’ charges of low benefit, abuse, and long hours. Illustriousness governor stepped into the altercate after the mayors of primacy two communities involved had publication different responses to the stop work.
The mayor of Allentown, Fred Hart, established a sweatshop court case composed of the town’s “leading citizens.” The mayor of Northampton, Charles Fox, blamed the strike on “agitators” and promised honourableness factory owners “police protection.” In spite of Fox’s opposition to the strikers, other Northampton officials criticized representation factory owners, noting that supposing they paid “decent wages,” the law protection would not be “necessary.”[18]
In another change from the 1903 strike, newspapers across the patch ran articles sympathetic to class strikers.
The Toledo, Ohio Leader featured an in depth being on April 28, 1933 release the headline, “Sweatshop Conditions Power Children’s Strike” and the head, “Pennsylvania Boys and Girls Total in Revolt Against Bosses; Alimony Below Chinese Standards.” The babe went on to charge, “Child labor exploited to unbelievable district by unscrupulous bosses during probity depression, has revolted.
And America—the richest nation in the world—is witnessing its first strike put ‘baby workers.’”[19] The newspaper correctly unyielding the high adult unemployment unfortunate during the Great Depression trade in a significant boost to babe labor reform efforts. The write off went on to shamelessly encourage the strikers’ cause,
“…hundreds of hungry, overworked, and grossly underpaid dynasty, employes [sic] of the shirt and pajama factory sweatshops which infest that district are parliament strike against wages as accept as 15 cents a hebdomad and working condition [sic] which would make the overseer realize a Soudan slave camp 1 with shame.”
Interestingly, the reporter additionally noted that “the children update engaged in active and vigorous picketing, and are receiving leadership support of decent-minded citizens.” Grace judged the strikers’ demands considerably “modest, very modest.
. . .All they are asking awaken is the ‘prompt payment work at wages,’ a 10 percent swell in piecework schedules, restoration illustrate a recent pay cut [rates had been cut from 6 cents a dozen to 3 cents], and recognition of ‘a union.’”[20]
Pennsylvania newspapers offered more repentant coverage, but were still nice to the strikers’ cause. Organization April 29th, the Philadelphia Register ran with the headline, “Sweatshop Probe Hears of Hardships discover ‘Baby Strikers’.” Even the Winston Salem, North Carolina Sentinel featured a story entitled, “Forlorn March of Sweat-Shop Children Protests $1 Week Wages.” The article bass the story of “Mildred Sweeney…a thin, snub-nosed little Irish wench, who ought to be eminence of nothing more serious amaze basket ball [sic].
But Mildred, at 15, has been illustriousness sole support of a coat of ten for the christian name year. From 7 o’clock acquit yourself the morning until 5 demonstrate the evening, Mildred trimmed shirts in a factory in City. The highest wages she feeling in one week for wrestling match her long hours of office was $1.10…One week she prefabricated just five cents.” The put pen to paper went on to describe regardless how Mildred often came home as well tired to eat, with lone 50 or 75 cents abolish show for the week’s duty.
Owners got away with rich such low wages because workers’ compensation was based on break apart work; one-half cent to 2 or 3 cents a 12 trimmed shirts. The piecework means meant that employees like Mildred were often idle during interpretation many hours they spent increase the workshops. “The week walk I just got a nickel,” Mildred reported, “I had make go everyday, just like at all times, and wait to see pretend there was anything to invalidate.
Sometimes we’d wait all trip and go home at obscurity without earning anything. But pretend you don’t come everyday, they fire you.”[21]
The practice of arrangement adolescent workers at very outlaw wages became more common renovation the economic depression worsened. Middling owners escaping high rents exertion the cities like Philadelphia stirred to small towns and hotfoot set up shop.
Local families, hurt by the depression, pull out sons and especially daughters play-act the new factories for jobs. Labor unions and government civil service throughout the country blamed kid labor for at least aptitude of the nation’s unemployment enigma and low wages among adults. In December, 1932 at magnanimity U.S.
Children’s Bureau’s emergency dialogue on child labor held be given Washington, D.C., out-going Secretary signify Labor William K. Doak, apprehensive that children were being taken at the expense of adults. The in-coming Secretary of Get, Frances Perkins agreed.[22]
The Great Kaput proved fertile ground for nobleness 1933 “Baby Strike.” On Apr 28 and 29, the governor’s “sweatshop hearings” were held recovered Northampton and then Allentown.
Class scene in Northampton included capital dramatic moment when one care the owners of the Run. & D. Shirt Company, Nathan Dashefsky, “boasted that he was armed. [Officials] required [him] norm unswing his pistol and retain it unloaded during the integrate of the hearing.” Dashefsky abuse told the investigators that crystal-clear did not believe “employees confidential the right to bargain … collectively on any matter.” Appease called all the young work force cane “liars.” Hale A.
Guss, neat Northampton borough manager, added in mint condition to the hearing’s excitment jam charging that the factory owners, Nathan and his brother Chivvy Dashefsky, used language in head start of their young female work force cane that “only the scum comprehensive the earth would use.” City E. Carr, Deputy Secretary apparent the State Department of Labour and Industry agreed and eminent that several of the girls were embarrassed to tell their stories.
Officials decided to pleasure a separate hearing conducted alone by women investigators, including leadership governor’s wife, Cornelia Bryce Pinchot.[23]
Cornelia Pinchot and Charlotte Carr summarized the young strikers’ testimonies in behalf of the Pennsylvania Department of Get and Industry Industrial Board. Carr told the board that influence strikers’ picketing “was followed backwards complete conformity of the unsanctioned and that both adults become calm minors cooperated in this effort.” A controversy arose when Carr noted that factory owners confidential illegally fired the striking officers.
As a result, school government in the area took goodness position that the state’s necessary school attendance law required drift fired workers (strikers?) under 16 return to school, thereby conception the strikers truant. The diet concluded that since the strikers were involved in a licit labor protest, the state’s required school attendance law should troupe be used to break picture strike.
Doing so placed youthful workers at a disadvantage compared to adults, but board liveware lamented that they had give up take this position, praising righteousness idea of even tougher secondary attendance laws. The board number one to continue dealing with class issue during the next month’s meeting.[24]
In the meantime, Cornelia Pinchot marched with the young strikers in Harrisburg on May 11th.
She also gave speeches return support of the strikers ditch were littered with sad fictitious about the girl workers.[25] Here the 1930s Cornelia Pinchot well-versed as a champion for rationalized labor’s efforts to end sweatshops and the employment of 14 and 15 year olds. Mid its next meeting, the Penn Industrial Board heard testimony distance from education officials arguing that prestige state’s main interest should hide to keep children in academy.
Members of the board transnational, but were bound by mangle to protect the rights promote to workers. On July 12, 1933 the board passed a determination prohibiting the hiring of juvenile strike breakers at the shops and ordering that minors restricted in a legal strike would not lose their work permits.[26] The board unofficially sympathized narrow education officials.
In the end, illustriousness Dashefsky brothers broke the flounce out at the Northampton factory.
On the contrary even before the governor’s sweatshop hearings, workers at the Quaker Allen Shirt Company signed adroit contract including a 10 percentage pay increase and recognition commemorate the Clothing Workers Union.[27] Trite least some of the strikers achieved their goals. But coercion from labor unions and laid off adults continued to push deliver a verdict officials to do something recognize the employment of 14 put forward 15 year olds in goodness nation’s factories.
It is rational to assume that the grassy Allentown-Northampton strikers were caught infant surprise when the Pennsylvania assembly passed a new law conduct yourself 1935 raising the minimum deposit age to 16. The carefulness also limited 16 and 17 year olds to an 8-hour a day, 40-hour work period. The act also placed obstacles on the kinds of put into operation for those 16-21.
About rendering same time the state passed a new compulsory school company law to age 16. Manifestly attitudes had changed, and rank scarcity of jobs for adults fueled new pressure for ameliorate at the national level gorilla well. In 1938, Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Benevolent. This significant legislation included integrity first federally enforceable restrictions confiscate child labor.[28]
While child welfare advocates celebrated the new laws gorilla a final victory in a-ok long struggle to end offspring labor, some adolescent workers most likely resented the new restrictions first past the post their freedom of choice.
Like go to regularly child laborers around the replica today, young workers saw individual as legitimate and autonomous officers with interests and rights clang to adults.
Oral histories depict adults who worked as domestic during the period suggest prowl many former child laborers intercontinental later in their lives implements reformers that school was orderly better choice than the have an effect place for children and teens.[29] Nevertheless, it is important keep include young workers’ views final experiences as well as excellence perspectives of adult reformers like that which tracing the history of labour reform and as we over policies to protect the interests of young workers throughout righteousness world today.
It is further important to note that adults must have a direct get somebody on your side in removing children from excellence workplace in order for significant change to take place.
[1] Estimates of the march participants miscellaneous at the time and increase twofold scholars’ evaluation of the cause since; on Mary Harris Linksman and her labor activism dominion Elliot Gorn, Mother Jones: Nobleness Most Dangerous Women in America (New York: Hill and Wang, 2001); for an overview mislay the Kensington children’s crusade grasp, Gorn, pp.131-138; C.
K. McFarland, “Crusade for Child Laborers: Colloquial Jones and the March make out the Mill Children, Pennsylvania Narration 38(July 1971):283-296; Russell E. Sculpturer, “The March of the Works class Children,” Social Science Review 41(September 1967), pp.300-310;and Stephen Currie, We Have Marched Together: The Method Children’s Crusade (Minneapolis, MN: Lyricist Publications Company, 1997); for a- handy overview of child undergo in Pennsylvania see Kenneth Catch-phrase.
Wolensky, “Child Labor in Pennsylvania,” (Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Historical Museum Office, 1998), Historic Leaflet No.43; Action Harris Jones described the July, 1903 march in her life story, The Autobiography of Mother Engineer, chapter 10,first published by River Kerr in 1925 and place on the Internet at http://www.angelfire.com/nj3/RonMBaseman/mojones1.htm, accessed January 20, 2003.
[2] Mac Parker, “Sweatshop Probe Hears allude to Hardships of ‘Baby Strikers’, Philadelphia Record, April 28, 1933, manufacture clipping in National Labor Conference Papers, Container 64, Library clean and tidy Congress, Manuscript Collection, Washington, D.C.
[3] Letter from Mary Harris Phonetician to Theodore Roosevelt, July 15, 1903, included in Philip Foner, ed., Mother Jones Speaks (New York: Monad Press, 1983), pp.555-556; Gron, The Most Dangerous Woman, p.135.
[4] Robert Willard McAhren, “Making the Nation Safe for Childhood: A History of the Moving for Federal Regulation of Descendant Labor, 1900-1938,” pp.5-6; U.S.
Children’s Bureau, “Child Labor Facts president Figures,” Children’s Bureau pub. cack-handed. 197 (Washington, D.C.: Government Writing Office, 1930).
[5] Gorn, The Virtually Dangerous Woman, p.139.
[6] The Racial Child Labor Committee collected gazette clippings on the strike, Folk Child Labor Committee Papers (NCLC papers), box 64, Library influence Congress, Manuscript Division, Washington, D.C.; Data on the 1933 deal a blow to was gleaned from the 1933-1934 Minute Books compiled for picture Pennsylvania Department of Labor bear Industry, RG 16, box 2, Pennsylvania State Archives, Harrisburg, PA.
[7] On the changing definitions pan childhood during the late 19th and early twentieth century witness for example, Viviana A.
Zelizer, Pricing the Priceless Child: Position Changing Social Value of Descendants (New York: Basic Books, 1985); Joseph M. Hawes, The Children’s Rights Movement: A History clean and tidy Advocacy and Protection, (Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1991); Gail S. Philologue, American Children’s Literature and righteousness Construction of Childhood (Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1998), pp.51-207; and Leroy Ashby, Endangered Children: Dependency, Namecalling, and Abuse in American History (Boston: Twayne Publishers), pp.79-124.
[8] Slogan.
Zoe Smith, “An Alternative Bearing of the 30s: Hine’s take up Bourke-White’s Industrial Photos, Journalism Three-monthly 60(1983):305-310; George Dimock, “Children engage in the Mills: Re-Reading Lewis Hine’s Child-Labour Photographs, Oxford Art Document 16(1993):37-54; Jennifer L. Peresie, “Crusader with a Camera: Lewis Hine and His Battle Against Toddler ‘Slavery,’” Pennsylvania Heritage 23(1997):4-13; existing Robert Macieski, “’Before Their Time’: Lewis W.
Hine and nobleness New Hampshire Crusade Against Infant Labor,” Historical New Hampshire 55(2000):90-107.
[9] Historians of slavery have be seen advertisements for runaways very usable for countering claims that blacks were docile and unintelligent; to about example see John H. Bracey, Jr., August Meier, and Elliott Rudwick, eds., American Slavery: Glory Question of Resistance (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1971); Eugene Rotate.
Genovese, From Rebellion to Revolution: Afro-American Slave Revolts in description Making of the Modern Field (New York: Vintage Books, 1981, c1979); and Norrence T. Golfer, Born and Child of Liberty, Yet a Slave: Mechanisms forget about Control and Strategies of Opposition in Antebellum South Carolina (Hanover, New Hampshire: University Press succeed New England, 1990); on honesty regulation of adolescent girls look for example, Kathy Peiss, Cheap Amusements: Working Women and Freedom in Turn-of-the-Century New York (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986); stomach Mary E.
Odem, Delinquent Daughters: Policing and Protecting Adolescent Human Sexuality in the United States, 1885-1920 (Chapel Hill: University clutch North Carolina Press, 1995).
[10] Gorn, The Most Dangerous Woman, p.131; Jones, Autobiography, chapter X.
[11] Currie, We Have Marched Together, p.37; Gorn, The Most Dangerous Woman, pp.132-134; Smith, “March of honourableness Mill Children,” pp.301-302; New Royalty Times, July 10, 1903, p.1, and July 12, 1903, p.1.
[12] Lindenmeyer, “A Right to Childhood, p.131; Trattner, Crusade for nobility Children, pp.171-172; Nettie P.
McGill, “Children in Street Work,” U.S. Children’s Bureau pub. no.183 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1928).
[13] Gorn, The Most Dangerous Chick, pp.133-134; Currie, We Have Marched Together, p.30-33; reports of prestige march are included in primacy Philadelphia Inquirer from July 8th through 20th, 1903, microfilm, Journal and Government Documents Reading Space, Library of Congress, and spiky the NCLC Papers, box 64.
[15] Currie, We Have Marched Together, pp.34-36; oral histories conducted mount mill workers from the Kensington region are included in, Trousers Seder, Voices of Kensington: Decreasing Mills, Vanishing Neighborhoods (Ardmore, PA: Whitmore Publishing Company, 1982); Gorn, The Most Dangerous Woman, p.140.
[16] The quotation from Ruben Dagenhart is from Lowell Mellet, “The Sequel of the Dagenhart Sway (also in Robert H.
Bremner, et. al., Children and Early life in America: A Documentary Description, [Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1971], vol. 2, pp.716-717); and Educator Mellet, “How Sharper than great Serpent’s Tooth It Is thoroughly Have a Thankless Child,” Labor, Nov. 17, 1923, reprinted temporary secretary Grace Abbott, The Child snowball the State: Legal Status featureless the Family, Apprenticeship, and Baby Labor, (Chicago: University of Metropolis Press, 1938) vol.
1, pp.515-517; see also Lowell Mellett, “The Dagenhart Boys,” clipping, U.S. Children’s Bureau Papers, RG 102, case 9, file 16, National Annals, College Park, Maryland.
[17] The Penn State Code includes specifics skim through each of these laws, Colony State Law Library, Harrisburg, PA; for a brief synopsis photograph, Wolensky, “Child Labor in Pennsylvania,” p.4.
[18] Budd L.
McKillips, “Sweatshop Conditions Force Children’s Strike,” City, Ohio Leader, April 28, 1933, NCLC papers, box 64.
[19] McKillips, “Sweatshop Conditions Force Children’s Strike.”
[21] Mac Parker, “Sweatshop Probe Hears of Hardships of ‘Baby Strikers’”, Philadelphia Record, April 29, 1933, NCLC papers, box 64; Dorothy Roe, “Forlorn Parade of Sweat-Shop Children Protests $1 Week Wages,” Winston Salem, North Carolina Sentinel, no date but probably Apr 28 or 29, 1933, NCLC papers, box 64.
[22] “Doak Says Children Should Not Be Employed,” New York Times, December (no day), 1932, NCLC papers, go on with 64; for an overview possession the Great Depression’s affect fondness child labor see Lindenmeyer, “A Right to Childhood,”pp.195-202; U.S.
Children’s Bureau memorandum, “Effect of Lobby codes on Child Labor,” June 5, 1935, Children’s Bureau registry (CBP), RG 102, box 6, file 6; and “NRA Summary,” typed report, CBP, RG 102,, box 10, file 3.
[23] Saxist, “Sweatshop Probe Hears of Hardships of ‘Baby Strikers’”.
[24] Minutes recall the Industrial Board, Department assess Labor and Industry, RG 16, “Meeting of the Industrial Scantling Meeting, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, April 21, 1933,” pp.75-76.
[25] “Speeches”, Cornelia Pinchot Papers, typed transcript of discourse, no date, but probably terrestrial several times in April coupled with May, 1933, box 271, row “Speeches, 1933”, Library of Relation, Manuscript Division, Washington, D.C.; “Mrs.
Pinchot Joins March of Strikers,” Lorain, Ohio Journal-Times Herald, Could 12, 1933, NCLC papers, pick up again 64.
[26] Minutes of the Progressive Board, June 22, 1933 bear July 12, 1933, “Employment bring in Minor under sixteen years rot age where strikes are prosperous progress,” pp. 89-92 and pp.109-110; the full regulation states: “The employment of minors under 16 years of age in cosmic establishment where a strike unseen lockout is in progress levelheaded prohibited, except that this bar shall not apply to small who were legally certificated enrol work in such establishment in the past the strike or lockout was declared”, Rule M-38 of rendering Regulations Affecting the Employment spot Minors.
[27] “Allentown Strikers Given Remuneration Increase,” Philadelphia Inquirer, April 25, 1933, microfilm, Library of Meeting, Newspapers and Government Documents Measurement Room, Washington, D.C.
[28] For upshot excellent summary of child labour and its regulation in excellence U.S.
up to the now see David I. Macleod, “Child Labor,” included in Joseph Lot. Hawes, editor, and Elizabeth Monarch. Shores, assistant editor, The Cover in America: An Encyclopedia (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC CLIO, 2001), vol. 1, pp.174-186.
[29] For sample see the earlier reference equal Ruben Dagenhart and oral histories included in Jacqueline Dowd Foyer, et.
al., Like a Family: The Making of a South Cotton Mill World, (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Multinational, 1987).
Posted onOctober 31, 2013bylindenme|